Cyberwar : how Russian hackers and trolls helped elect a president what we don't, can't, and do know / Kathleen Hall Jamieson.
Material type: TextLanguage: English Publication details: New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2018.Description: xiii, 314 pages : illustrations ; 22 cmISBN:- 9780190915810
- Presidents
- Elections
- POLITICAL SCIENCE / General
- POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Process / Elections
- Trump, Donald, 1946-
- -- United States -- Election -- 2016
- -- Corrupt practices -- United States
- Russia (Federation) -- Foreign relations -- United States
- United States -- Foreign relations -- Russia (Federation)
- 324.9730932 23 JAM
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Books | CUTN Central Library Social Sciences | Non-fiction | 324.9730932 JAM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 40947 |
Part One: Who Did It, Why, and How It May Have Mattered Part Two: The Pre-Requisites of Influence Part Three: Exposure: How the Russians Affected the News and Debate Agendas in the Last Month of the Campaign Part Four: What We Don't, Can't, and Do Know About How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect Donald J. Trump
"In Cyberwar, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, who sifted through a vast amount of polling and voting data, is able to conclude with a reasonable degree of certainty that Russian help was crucial in elevating Trump to the Oval Office. Put simply, by changing the behavior of key players and altering the focus and content of mainstream news, Russian hackers reshaped the 2016 electoral dynamic. At the same time, Russian trolls used social media to target voting groups indispensable to a Trump victory or Clinton defeat. There are of course many arguments on offer that push against the idea that the Russians handed Trump his victory. Russia's goal was fomenting division, not electing Trump. Most of the Russian ads reportedly did not reference either the election or a candidate. Nor did they differ much from U.S.-based messaging that was already in play. Russian intervention did not surgically target Trump in key states. Finally, if WikiLeaks' releases of stolen email had truly affected the vote, Clinton's perceived honesty would have dropped in October. Jamieson, drawing from her four decades of research on the role of media in American elections, dispenses with these arguments through a forensic tracing of both Russian hackers' impact on media coverage as well as the ebbs and flows of Trump's polling support over the course of the campaign. Combining scholarly rigor with a bracing argument, Cyberwar shows that we can now be reasonably confident that Russian efforts helped put Trump in the White House"--
There are no comments on this title.